monkinetic weblog | redmonk.net

Since 1999, IX Ed.

Marching Penguin Feet

Monday, November 27th, 2006

Adelina and I went to see Happy Feet last weekend… the movie was really good (if a bit preachy towards the end), but I wish that Adelina had been able to see the real penguins in March of the Penguins first. Luckily, it came on TV this weekend and we were able to TiVo it, so she got to see it while the other was still fresh in her mind. We all enjoyed the movie, though we decided that emperor penguins, while being cute and fuzzy as chicks and fun and funny as adults, lead a life that we’re glad we don’t.

Office Space: Re-Cut

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

Preview for Mike Judge’s new psychological thriller. digg story

office_space.png

“That’s the last straw…” (Fade to black)

War of the Worlds: Extermination

Thursday, June 30th, 2005

|Jodi| and I went to see Spielberg’s new movie, War of the Worlds last night. I wasn’t sure what to expect, and had tried to stay away from spoiler sites (which are generally a guilty pleasure of mine). I read the original novel by H. G. Wells in an anthology I got as a kid, and also had heard the Orson Welles ‘Mercury Theater on the Air’ broadcast on cassette tape as a teen. Speilberg’s vision borrows from both, and exudes the hopelessness and desperation that Orson Welles’ interpretation captured so brilliantly.

This is not a summer blockbuster movie, though it’s running in June and probably cost a gazillian bucks. This is an intense, visceral film, shot almost exclusively from street level. There are few, if any, of the wide, panning “money shots” that populate your typical “Independence Day”-type blockbuster.

The film follows deadbeat dad Ray Ferrier (Cruise) and his two kids as they make their way from New York to Boston during an alien invasion, and because of the intimate POV the audience almost never sees anything the main characters do not experience. Several times we see the military heading off to do battle with the alien tripods, but the action that typically fills our view and overwhelms the audience instead happens off screen. In Spielberg’s vision, we instead experience the terror of the unknown - the frozen grip of the knowledge that “just over that hill” indescribably horrible things are happening, and there’s nothing we can do about it. There are several scenes that rival the basement scenes in Signs - horror and dread at the inexplicable lights, sounds and violence taking place outside.

The film is not without its weaknesses, including the ending. We do get to see the aliens, which in a small way diminishes the “cold, unsympathetic, vast intelligences” described in the introduction to both novel and movie. But nevertheless I was glued to my seat the whole film, and was pleasantly surprised at the character arc given to Cruise, as well as what he does with it. The highlight of the film has to be the performance from Dakota Fanning (”Taken”, “Man On Fire”) as Ferrier’s daughter Rachel. She is a scarily amazing actress - flawlessly portraying the innocent but mature-beyond-her-years child, then the confusion, denial, terror — even the vacancy of a mind overwhelmed.

All in all, I would completely recommend the movie, with the warning that this is an intense, and intensely personal, film. Enjoy, but take the PG13 rating seriously - it’s not a kids movie.

Batman Began

Friday, June 17th, 2005

Jon, Micah, and I went to see Batman Begins on Wednesday. It was great.

Highlight in 4 words: “tazer to the face”.

Once More Through The Wardrobe

Monday, June 6th, 2005

|Jodi| and I are re-reading the Chronicles of Narnia for the nth time. In preparation, of course, for Dec 9th.

We’re reading an old copy of the series, that is missing one book (Voyage of the Dawn Treader), becuase we have not found a new set we like. One problem for me is that all the new sets put the books in something like “chronological” order based on events in the series, rather than the order in which they were written by C. S. Lewis.

And yes, I know that Lewis himself preferred the chronological order. Perhaps it’s just that I so loved the books when I read them (and re-read them and re-read them and re-read them) as a child, that I want my child to experience the story unfolding as I did. I’m with Wikipedia on this:

Nevertheless, the reordering has brought ire from many fans of the series, who appreciate the original order which introduces important parts of the Narnia universe in the early part of the series and then provides explanation for them later in the prequels, in particular the creation story in The Magician’s Nephew.

Reading the series now, when it’s been over 15 years since I read it last, I’m left a bit melancholy. The stories have not lost their magic, but the books are shorter and more child-friendly than I remember them. Since I graduated from The Chronicles to Tolkien’s trilogy, my problem is likely one of comparison — Tolkien’s writing is deeper, richer and more academic than that of Lewis. I love them both dearly, though, and will try to be sure that our children get to experience both series, both in print (”as God intended”) and on film (as rendered masterfully by Messrs. Jackson and Adamson)

Wallace & Gromit trailer - in theaters Fall 2005

Tuesday, March 1st, 2005

Oh boy oh boy oh boy! (WMV)

Quick Review: “Miracle” not so miraculous

Sunday, September 5th, 2004

|Jodi|’s parents are in town for the holiday weekend, and last night we watched Miracle, the story of the 1980 US Olympic hockey team and their quest to beat the indomitable Soviets in the Lake Placid games. All in all, a good story, a classic underdog story.

But despite all the raves the movie got from friends and family, I wasn’t that impressed. I liked the hockey (a sport that is growing on me despite living in a desert) but the characterizations were weak, all in all. Kurt Russell did a pretty good job as coach Herb Brooks, but all the other characters and relationships in the movie were only sketched out at best. I also thought that the numerous references to current events of the time felt tacked on, designed to win “context points”. I suppose they were designed to help explain the mood of the nation at the time, but they were not well connected to the coach and his 20 players - which should have been the focus of the film.

Gratuitous self-analysis: what does it say about me, or about our movie culture, that at the end I wanted more to see the Russians suffer in anguish over their defeat than the US team rejoicing? Am I such a vengeful person? Or am I still feeling the effects of my own upbringing in the tail end of the cold war? The Lake Placid games are the first Olympics I have a memory of (though they’re sketchy - I was 9 at the time) and I have a vague memory of the hoopla surrounding the hockey events, but not much else.

Anyway, not a bad film, but at 136 minutes I expected a bit more for my time.