Google Contacts API debuts - how useful for distributed sites?

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

developers-guide-protocol-contacts-data-api-google-code_1204813301232.png

Yesterday Google released a new contacts API, which has social network operators scrambling to implement.

Have you ever been on a web-site that asked you for your Google username and password so that it can import your Gmail contact list? Did you think twice before giving out that information, hoping the web-site would not use it to access your credit card information stored with Google Checkout? Now you don’t have to!

We’re happy to announce the availability of our Google Contacts Data API that gives programmatic access to your contact list. The contact list is shared among Google applications like Gmail, Reader, Calendar, and more.

This is exciting news for those of us working on DiSo — it would be great to give users the option to add their Google Contacts to their friends. Well, at least until I started reading the Developer’s Guide. The API (like many of Google’s APIs) requires AuthSub support in the client, which requires registering your site with Google:

Note: You must register your application domain with Google before you can use AuthSub with the Contacts Data API.

It’s my understanding that this means that any blog owner who wanted to use a hypothetical DiSo Google contacts import would have to have registered their site with Google, which sounds like a huge roadblock for us. Am I reading this wrong? I’d love to hear from other developers on this.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://redmonk.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/397

3 Comments

Wouldn't that potential roadblock depend upon the level of effort of registering ones site with Google? Let's do a "Pros and Cons" listing here, on what that might be like.

Here's a rough outline from Google's instructions:

  1. Add your domain.
  2. Verify your domain.
    • Uploading a file:
    • Adding a meta tag:
  3. Provide domain information.
    • Target URL path prefix
    • Domain description:

You read it like I do. Still, with the only useful data in most people's GMail address books being email addresses, we'd need some kind of mapping service to get truly useful information (ie, URLs) out. Still, better than the antipattern :)

Leave a comment

R.E.M. Says:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Steve published on March 6, 2008 2:26 PM.

Drivetime Debrief - Getting the stuff from the place to the thing was the previous entry in this blog.

300,000 gallons per second is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID